|
Report problem Submit a news tip News
Local/Regional
Idaho Business Nation/World Voices Handle Extra Weather Columnists Newstracks Full headline list Archives Photo reprints OpinionSportsCommunityLifestyleWeekly sectionsExtra
awayfinder »
BizFinderNW » Buy photo reprints Comics Crossword DownToEarthNW Health Newspaper In Education Online Contests Special Sections Spokane.net » Sudoku |
A SPOKESMAN-REVIEW INVESTIGATIVE REPORT Interview with Jim West
Transcript from May 4, 2005The following is a transcript of an interview between Mayor Jim West and Spokesman-Review reporters Bill Morlin and Karen Dorn Steele, which took place at The Spokesman-Review building the evening of May 4, 2005. Spokesman-Review photojournalist Brian Plonka was also present during the interview. Q: Do we have your permission to tape record this? Q: We could do that. My tape recorder hasn't been working well lately. Q: First of all, I want to tell you in the most direct, simplist of terms is what we're going to talk to you about here today is nothing personal. It's something Karen and I and the editors here are doing as part of our job as journalists. It's nothing personal. I know you're probably going to try and simplify it into that, but I want to tell you at the outset, this is nothing personal. I'm merely doing my job. In doing that job, we need to give you a chance to fully respond to some of the issues that have been brought to our attention. Do you understand that?
Q: As I told you on the phone, what we're talking about is an outgrowth of the story we published in 2003. You remember that story? Q: I called you and quoted you in that story. Right? Did I accurately quote you in that story? Q: I asked you about your former friend and fellow deputy David Hahn. Q: You were scout leaders together and deputies together. Q: His life ended rather tragically in August of 81 and that story focused on some allegations of sexual abuse that were brought to the forefront by three young men who we identified on the record. Do you recall that? Q: Their names were Brett and Rob Galliher, Douglas Chicklinsky, and a fourth man came forward after that story was published who says he was also abused by your former friend, the late deputy Hahn. That resulted in a lawsuit that's preceeding against Spokane County. Q: Are you aware of that lawsuit? Q: Have you been briefed about the ramifications of that lawsuit? Q: Do you know that you are on a witness list for that lawsuit? Q: Told that by whom? Q: Terry Lackie? Q: Phil Harris? Q: Who told you that? Q: A city attorney Q: That's a pretty important trial
. How and when was it you became aware that you could be a witness in that trial Q: Earlier this year? Q: Was it a phone call, an e-mail? Q: You don't remember who it was from? Q: Generally what were you told by whomever passed this message onto to you Q: Yeah, it is. Which is a matter of public record, by the way. If you went to the court file, which we did, you'll see that your name is on that list. Q: Right Q: You don't remember who it is. I presume, have you talked to a counsel about the prospect of you testifying in that trial or being subpoenaed as a witness? Q: You have not? Q: Either a private attorney or city attorneys? Q: Does it concern you that you are on that list Q: Let's go there next. A story, actually a story I wrote back in November 1978, there's a young Jim West, even younger Al Teeples, and a Larry Erickson. Q: In that story, look at the yellow highlighted portions of that story, it talks about you and another deputy taking some troubled youth to a camp, I think it's at Diamond Lake. Elaborate on what that says. First of all, is that an accurate representation? Q: Your memory is pretty sharp Q: This was in 1977? This story is in 1978 and it references last summer. Q: So would it be in 77? Q: Is this talking about the same thing that you're talking about Q: [ INAUDIBLE ]
towards youth alternative program or something? Q: You wrote the paper for whom? Q: It was an LEAA grant? Q: Who submitted the grant Q: What was the amount of the grant? Q: Oh is that all? What did it pay for? Q: Paid for their food up there? Did you and Deputy Hahn or the others involved draw a salary out of it? Q: So you're donating your time? Q: Who were the kids? Q: Took them up how? Q: Did you have one of those too by the way? Q: You didn't have one? Q: Did it have a shell on the back of it or a camper? Q: So you're saying there were only four kids up there? Q: Who was your partner in Down Under Divers. Q: He was a scout at the time Q: Was he there dressed as a boy scout? Q: This was at Camp Cowles? Q: It was summer time? Q: How did you work this in between the other activities that routinely go on there in terms of the boy scout camp? This was not a boy scout function Q: So was it a scout activity, a sheriff's department activity, what ? Q: Did you have to get permission from some superiors of the sheriff's department to do that. Q: If this was in 77, Reilly was still there Q: So you believed that you would have cleared, gotten the necessary permission Q: Were you doing any of this in uniform up there? Q: Right Q: Did you wear Boy scout uniforms? Were you there as a boy scout leader or as a cop or as a civilian I'm just trying to figure out the parameters of this. Q: So the scouts were there at the same time? Q: They were sort of mingled in with the other kids that were there Q: The reason I ask when I talked to Jerry Hendren about that, he said he was invited up as a speaker. He said this encampment lasted the better part of a week. Q: A week long? Q: He said he just came up for a day, he was invited as a former Q: He was a former athlete, he was talking about being an athlete, and a good citizen Q: He said he spoke to about 30 kids, which is different than four kids Q: Do you remember their names Q: You don't remember any of them [ REDACTED ] Q: Was any audit ever done of how successful or not successful this was? Q: We'd like to see it. Was this a one-year deal, one year, one time deal? Q: You didn't do it the next summer? Q: No more grant money? Q: Right, you left sometime in 78 to run. Q: In your capacity, you still stayed though as scout leader at Hamblen School Q: You were scout leader at Hamblen School clear up to the time Dave Hahn died. Is that right? That's what you told me in our last interview Q: August of 81 Q: So you were scout leader when you were on the city council Q: Who's that Q: You turned the troop over to Rich Robinson. After you and Hahn left, Rich Robinson, whose a former Q: So he took over the troop? Q: That's not Tim Carlson is it Q: Which is the same time frame though. 81 you got elected to the council Q: You're on the council until 82? Q: so what time frame was Tim Carlson. Wasn't he involved with some of your scout activities? Q: Do you know Tim Carlson was sexually abused by George Robey, another scout leader Q: I'm the first one telling you that? Q: Did you know he was sexually abused by anyone? Q: Did you know when he lived with you that he had been sexually abused by George Robey? Q: How well did you know George Robey? Q: You ran Hamblen, he's at Hutton. Our information is that your troop and Robey's troop went on several outings together and you're telling me Q: Not true? Q: What about the hike around Mt. Rainier? Q: So some members of that troop did Q: Do you know what John Gillickson does now for a living Q: That's right. Have you talked to him recently Q: So that was the only occasion boys from Troop 353 joined the boys from your Troop 345 on an outing? Is that what you're telling me?A: Yep Q: One time and one time only Q: They never did anything else together? Q: 82, eight months after David Hahn. Q: Uh huh Q: My information is he lived with you before then, but I may be mistaken Q: How long was it he lived with you? Q: Are you aware what subsequently happened to Tim Carlson? Q: John Gillickson? Q: Cause there's several Gillicksons. Q: In fact, he's twice convicted. He's now a registered sex offender. He's been twice convicted of molesting young boys. Q: Let's shift gears briefly and talk about some of your legislative stuff and I think Karen wants to ask you some questions in that regard
Q: I was curious some of the positions you've taken as you were ascending in power and you get high marks obviously for your legislative skills from people I've talked to, but in terms how do you align yourself on some of the more conservative issues having to do with your parting on like gay rights and abortion rights and that famous teen sex bill back in 86 that you would have sponsored the teen aid abstinence bill. Q: It would have made a misdemeanor for any kind of sexual contact for kids under 18. Q: You say you didn't see that part of the bill? Q: It got significant negative press on it, National Lampoon Q: Did you go Q: I was just wondering if you think in your career in the legislature you're aligned with the Christian right or the more real conservative elements of your party on some of these bills that would have regulated sexual behaviors. Q: Were you or weren't you? Q: What about on gay rights issues? You pretty much consistently oppose any expansion of legislation that extends civil rights protections to gays. Q: I'd be somewhat interested Q: In troop 345, one of the tips that came out of the story we wrote a couple of years ago, was there a group within that troop when you were at its helm with Deputy Hahn, was a group within that boy scout troop. When you were the scout master with Dave Hahn. That's true you were the scout master with Dave Hahn, right? That's what the records show. Q: He came to you via the Sheriff's dept. Q: Who was it that recruited David Hahn, was it Dick Bond? Q: What's Pat Bond's relationship to Dick Bond? Q: Do you know Dave? Q: One of the tips that came to us after that story, Mr. Mayor, is it within Troop 345 when you and David Hahn were its leaders was a group called the Naked Apes. Who were the Naked Apes? And why did they get that name? There's a partial smile I see on your face Q: On a boy scout uniform? Q: So you don't remember who called the Naked Apes? If I got an email from 2 or 3 people saying you need to ask Jim West and anyone else who had something to do with that about why was there a group in Troop 345 that called themselves the Naked Apes, what would your response be? What are you saying? You don't remember it? It didn't exist? Q: You don't remember it. Q: As scout master, if a group within your troop called themselves the Naked Apes, isn't something you might kind of remember and/or ask how did they originate that name? What was the origin of that name? Q: You found out how many years later Q: Was this just a campfire or a fire that got out of control? Q: That reminds me. Another group within Troop 345 called themselves, they had a pyro kind of a name, Pyromaniacs or something like that. Q: Was this a group of boys from Troop 345 that you took into Bob Marshall. Q: So if a group of them is calling themselves the Pyromaniacs, and I don't have the notes in front of me, but it's something like that, that there were these other groups. The point that some people were making were these names were sort of in jest but there had to be some logical extension of why they called themselves that. If you start a forest fire, you might call yourselves the Pyromaniacs, if you call yourselves the Naked Apes, there might be a reason you're calling yourself the Naked Apes. Q: I'm just asking you, you were the scout master. Q: I want to go back to Robert Galliher. Does that name mean anything to you? Q: Who were the plaintiffs in the lawsuit against the county in which you're listed as a witness? Q: It's against Spokane County. Q: Hahn Q: Right. The plaintiffs are actually identified by their initials in what's public record. But doing reporting on this, we've identified all four of them. They are Doug Chicklinsky, Brett Galliher, Rob Galliher and a man from Oklahoma whose name doesn't immediately come to me. He's the man who came forward after that story and said the same thing had happened to him. Do you recall ever meeting Rob Galliher? Is that a no? Q: You could have? Q: You don't know him? Q: What about Brett Galliher? Q: You don't remember? Q: The reason I'm asking you that is in the course of the litigation against Spokane County, and it's against Spokane County, it's not against you, but you are listed as a potential witness Q: You're not even a defendant in the lawsuit, but you could be deposed and asked some of these same sorts of questions I suppose. One of the people that has been deposed in that lawsuit is Robert Galliher. Are you aware that he has been deposed? Q: Do you know who deposed him? Q: Do you know who's representing the county in that lawsuit Q: I just gotta ask these questions. Do you know who's representing the county in that case? You don't? Q: The firm of Evans, Craven, Lackie is representing Spokane County. Q: Do you know Terry Lackie? Is that a no? Q: Have you talked to Terry about this lawsuit? Q: Have you talked to anyone about this lawsuit? Q: That's the extent of your conversation? Q: I'm setting that as a preliminary stage because Rob Galliher was one of those people that was deposed. He was deposed about a week ago, excuse me about a month ago in Seattle by Terry Lackie. Q: Prior to the deposition, Rob Galliher Q: Well, we're going to get there. Rob Galliher turned over to the county a letter that he'd written from a jail cell. Are you aware of what letter he's written from the jail cell? A: I'm not aware of any letter Q: You're not aware of any letter? Q: In that letter, he wrote it from jail and he actually wrote it from a state prison institution. But before he went to the prison institution, he was out at Geiger. He'd been rearrested after our story appeared and his brother appeared I think maybe on a TV show or at a rally here, one of the Catholic priest rallies. At any rate, did there come a time when you went to Geiger or sent a message to Geiger to tell Rob Galliher to keep his mouth shut and not talk about you or implicate you in that lawsuit? Q: Anonymously? Q: Man or woman? Q: It's Galliher (morlin spells out). Somebody calls you and tells you you better go talk to him? Who was that somebody? Q: Why did they tell you you should go talk to Galliher? Q: Are you saying extortion? Q: Is that your word, I don't want to lead you? Q: By telling you to go see Galliher, how was that harassing you? Q: Big trouble for whom? Q: Did they say that? Q: What were you going to see him about? Q: What were you going to see him about? Q: I don't understand Q: Did you speak directly to Mr. Rob Galliher?A.: No Q: Did you go out to Geiger and talk to Rob Galliher? Q: He was at Geiger. Q: Did you talk to Mike Pannick who was the director out there to tell Rob Galliher to shut his mouth or be quiet? Q: When did that happen? Q: Timeframe wise, when did that happen? Q: Rob Galliher says that happened about sometime after June of 03 when we published our story Q: No you didn't. You haven't told me about it. Q: During which campaign? Q: We checked with Geiger. They say yes in fact the message came out there from you and it was during the summer of 2003. Q: Are you disputing that? Q: You don't recall when it was, but if that's what they're telling us when it was, and in fact that's the time it also squares when was Rob Galliher at Geiger. He wasn't there when you were running for Senate. He was there in the summer 2003. So if he's telling us and Robin Butcher, who was his parole officer, said she was ordered by Mike Pannek to go to Mr. Galliher and tell him to cease and desist and not make any references to you, you're not disputing that version? Q: How were they harassing you? Q: I still don't see how that arises to the level of harassment. I'm having difficulty
. Q: How many of those phone calls are you saying you had regarding this Galliher issue? Q: Do your cell phone records reflect where that call came from? Or shouldn't they? Q: Did you look at your cell phone records to see where the call came from? Q: Would you make those records available to us so we can see where it may have come from? Q: You don't have those records anymore, OK. Q: So if Galliher and the people at Geiger say that you sent the message out there in 2003 after this story was published
Q: June 2003. When did you formerly announce for Mayor? Q: So this is before you formerly announce for mayor, the story is published. The time frame is while you are running for Mayor is when they say you showed up out there. You are a mayoral candidate. Q: The filing period, right. Q: Is it your recollection that you were going to announce candidate for Mayor when you went out there? Q: Oh, phoned out there then Q: When did it happen then, if you remember? Q: I'm only reconstructing this based on the records that we know when Galliher was there. Q: Yes, you talked to Pannek. Q: So you're not disputing that that happened? You're saying you did that because you were getting harassing phone calls? Q: Did you talk to him at all about the story in which he was alleging Q: Mr. Galliher Q: Never met him? If he told us you had shown up there late at night for a face to face encounter with him, your response to that would be? Q: You never met Mr. Galliher Q: Did not go out and see him. Q: But you acknowledge that you sent the message to Panneck. Q: What is your opinion as to why they wanted to see you? Q: It was not very common for you to call those prisons and tell this prisoner to quit harassing me, is it? How many times did you do that? Q: So it's the only time you ever went to those extremes then because you were getting these phone calls. Q: But you had no idea what the harassment was about? Q: Let's move this on. After Galliher goes to prison he then brings a lawsuit against Spokane County that we previously talked about. Q: That's what he said. Q: Alright. I think you're truthful, I'm just merely telling you
this is what I told you on the phone. People tell us things, we need to hear what you have to say. You said it's a flat lie, that's what you want to say, that's what you want to say.
Q: That's fine. That's what we're here to talk to you about. Let's move this forward. Galliher, Rob Galliher goes to prison, he gets out of prison, and while he's in prison, he and these other men bring the lawsuit against the county in 2004. It's now set for trial in November this year, the same trial you're listed on as a witness, the one against Spokane County. Again, you're not a defendant, nobody's accusing you of criminal arguing Q: But they have taken the deposition of Robert Galliher and I eluded earlier to a letter. Before they took his deposition, he wrote a letter from prison and in that letter he said that not only had he been sexually abused by David Hahn, but he had been sexually abused by Jim West. Q: I'm just telling you what the letter says. Q: He actually wrote the letter to an author who's a psychologist and the letter had to be turned over to the county attorneys at the discovery in this trial proceeded. Are you aware of that letter? Q: Have you seen the letter? Q: I'm asking you again Q: Do you know your name is mentioned in that letter and the serious allegations Q: I don't actually have a copy of it with me, because I didn't quite prepare for this.
Q: We have the letter Q: In the letter, he says he was introduced to you by Dave Hahn at Dave Hahn's apartment on South Regal. Again, I need an audible response. Q: Did you ever go to Dave Hahn's apartment on South Regal" Q: Were you ever roommates with Dave Hahn? Q: Did you live close to him? Q: At that time, on Regal also? Q: But didn't live together? Q: So people from your sheriff's days who tell me West and Hahn used to live together, that's not true Q: Never did? Q: He says that Hahn introduced you to him, Rob Galliher, at Hahn's apartment. You don't recall such a meeting?
Q: He also says you sexually abused him at Hahn's apartment. Q: Didn't happen? Q: Who's "they?" Q: What were the rumors? Q: Who did you hear those rumors from? Q: Who were some of the former deputies? Q: This is a man you were close friends on the sheriff's dept. Q: Is that an exaggeration to say you were close friends, you spent a lot of time together, you're both kind of poster boys for the sheriff's dept. as the way it was described to me. They were proud of the image that both of you portrayed to that sherriff's dept. Is that an exaggeration? Q: Well you must have some confidence in yourself though to run for sheriff. In fact, Dave Hahn was actually given the co detail because Larry Erickson wanted a big strapping handsome guy in a sheriff's uniform to be on camera. Q: You left the department by then. At any rate, back to the Hahn issue. The first time you became aware of these allegations that Galliher is raising is in this conversation right now? Q: Yes. Q: You've not heard about them before now? Q: Haven't heard about them from anyone? Q: Beyond that letter, that letter by the way was turned over to the county's attorneys as part of discovery, and they are then allowed to brief their clients who are Todd Mielke, Phil Harris and Mark Richard. You haven't heard from any of them that you're named in this letter? Q: Because he accuses you of some serious things in this letter and it's now basically part of the record of the discovery and the public record associated with this lawsuit. You understand that? Q: You haven't gotten any wind of this from your friends? Todd Mielke and Phil Harris and close, longtime allies or political confidants of yours. A.: Todd was a high school when I met him. He was the first high school intern I had in the legislature, 1983. He worked for me, he was my campaign manager the first time I ran for the senate. Q: So he's close to you? Q: So if he had gotten wind of the fact his former friend and mentor had been accused of sexual wrongdoing, wouldn't it logical for him to reach out and tell you, "Hey, Jim, there's trouble brewing. This guy's accusing you of all this." You're saying that hasn't happened? Q: What about Phil Harris who is the number two guy in the boy scouts when some of this happened. Q: What was his connection with that troop? Q: He was the number two guy here at the scout office. Q: At that time he was the guy who was responsible for all the scouting programs on the South Hill Q: The reason I'm asking is I know how the political system works and you have two close friends and allies in the county courthouse who are being sued and this allegation about you has surfaced, and it just seems to me logically that word would have come back to you through your former friends over there. Are they letting you down? Or what?
Q: Beyond the letter, Mr. Galliher was deposed under oath and he was asked about this letter by the county's attorneys and be basically related the same information in the deposition. The specifics of it are he basically says there were four occasions where you sexually molested him. Q: Was there even one occasion when you
. Q: Never touched him Q: I'm not raising these allegations, he raised them in a deposition, under oath, in a lawsuit against Spokane County. Q: So you understand where I'm coming from? I'm merely the messenger here. I didn't write the letter, I didn't say those words at the deposition. You're saying it's all untrue and you haven't heard about any of it -- that you're hearing about it for the first time tonight here in our office here in the newspaper? Q: Tell me about that. What did they tell you? Q: Questions about what? Thought you said you didn't know what we were working on? Q: I still don't know. Reporters are sort of like open ended asking questions. There aren't any specifics. I think we've probably pretty well covered the waterfront theory regarding that. You're saying it's all untrue and it's the first you've heard about it for the first time now. Is that an accurate summation? Q: Let's move the clock ahead now to the time when you become mayor. Last year as we were pursuing some of these leads, by the way I was doing it at the direction of my editors, it's not something I just decided on my own. I'm following orders from Steve Smith, Carla Savalli and a whole battery of folks down on the other floor. There came a time when a young man, we identified a young man through the various leads that these stories produced and his first name for this discussion I'm going to call him Danny. Do you know any young men named Danny Q: Who do you know by that name? Q: Wrong [ NAME REDACTED ]. This was Dannyboy [ NAME REDACTED ] that met you on a website called gay.com Q: We'll get to his last name if that's important. Do you recall meeting a man named Dannyboy? [ NAME REDACTED ]. Do you belong to the website gay.com? Q: What names have you used at gay.com? Q: Well, if I told you that we know that you've used the names Cobra82nd and Rightbi-Guy, what would your response be? Are you going to deny that? Q: Well I think on this next line of questioning that we get into here, I think it's really important, if you want my advice, I think it's important instead of not answering, that you answer the questions truthfully and explain your version of events here. That's certainly your option. You're free to get up and walk out of here, I'm not a cop or a police officer, not a prosecutor, I'm just listening to you as a public official and you're a highly-placed public official, and what you do in your private life, I couldn't care less. In fact, you're talking to probably some of the more liberal members of our staff. What you do in your private life is no concern of mine. What you do in your capacity as mayor, however, I have a substantial interest in, and a vested interest in. Q: We're going to get there. When did you first become a member or subscriber to Gay.com? Q: We're getting there. I want you to understand, I want to understand, when did you become a subscriber to gay.com? Q: We're cutting to the chase. The line of questioning you need to follow, I need to understand these basic questions before we get there. Believe me, I'm going to get there. When did you become a member of gay.com? Q: Use the names Rightbi-Guy and Cobra82nd? Q: Last year, one of the men that we interviewed is a young man named Danny. I'm going to call him that. Do you remember talking to dannyboy [ NAME REDACTED ] at gay.com Q: You're not going to answer that question? Why is it you choose not to answer? Q: That's fine. At any rate, we located and interviewed several times, dannyboy (true screen name redated) and have a tape-recorded statement from him. He tells us in June of last year after chatting on line several times, that you and he went out on a date at the Red Robin. Q: So you did go on a date with him? Q: This is a young man that you met. Are you disagreeing with the terms you met him on gay.com? How is it if you don't want to talk about it? Q: I'm gonna get there, I just want to understand
..Did you meet him on gay.com? Q: You don't want to answer that question? Q: [ INAUDIBLE ]
. You drove and picked him up at a country club and you were driving your Lexus convertible? Is it true or not true? Q: I just got to give you a chance to respond. Just like when Rob Galliher said you had come to the prison, you said you didn't. Now if this other young man says you picked Q: That you did not. This guy says you picked him up in your blue Lexus. If that didn't happen, I want to give you chance to say it didn't happen. If it did happen, and this guy's lying, I don't know if this guy's lying to me, Jim. I'm here to ask
. He says that that evening concluded and you kissed him. That's what he says, that the evening ended with consensual sex. And your response to that is
. Is he lying to us or is that true? Q: I don't go around believing 18-year-old kids. They could make stuff up. You're an important figure in our community, you've been here, you're now the mayor, the most powerful Republican in the state legislature. That is a pretty serious charge to be labeling someone with your portfolio. And we didn't, and it's an important point I want to make with you, we didn't rush that story into print. We haven't even printed anything about the kid. We didn't believe him. I'm still not sure if I believe him. That's why I'm sort of painstakingly going through this to determine if he's lying to us
. Q: I understand. He's a kid who's questioning his own being, his own place in life, and whatever he does, that's his business. But, what he was telling us was implicating you, a public figure. Understand that? Q: We're not being mean-spirited by doing this. You understand? Q: As to what happened on that date, is it fair and accurate for me to summarize that it is something you choose not to talk about. Q: Was that fair and accurate? That you choose not to talk about? Q: After that concluded and I interviewed him, I asked him to capture, he said he had met you as cobra82nd, you've gone on a date, and I said if you talk to him again in the chat room, would you capture some conversations? At my direction, he did that. By then, you had changed your identity to rightbi-guy and you had conversations with him in November and December that we have copies of. Do you care to see them? Q: I just want to make you know that indeed we have them. You talked to him in November and New Year's Eve
.. Q: First of all, I'd like to ask you, did you have any of these chats from City Hall? Q: Did you have any chats with, where were you at? Q: They didn't occur in the City Hall office? Q: The computer records would show no reference when you logged on to the City Hall computer that you'd gone to gay.com? Q: It'll show that? Q: If you visited that website, you've done it on your own time, in your own home on your own computer? Is that what you're telling us? Q: Because we didn't really understand or appreciate, I don't go to chat rooms, I'm not much on computers Q: What is a curiosity thing? Q: Tell me about that. Don't you look at a computer all day at work and you go home and want to look at another computer. I just don't understand it. My eyes are like, I don't want to look at a computer.
Q: No, you did not use city equipment, OK. Initially, we had trouble comprehending this and we don't have the ability to, I can't go log in to Gay.com [ INAUDIBLE ] we employ
Who is rightbi-guy? Who is cobra82nd? Who are his profiles? Is it in fact Mayor Jim West? Are the things that this young man is telling us, are those things true. Q: You're not telling us that's not true. That you've not used those names? Is that right? You said it's none of my business. [ INAUDIBLE ] Who's Moto-Brock, Jim? Q: So you've chatted with Moto-Brock? And in fact offered him a job Q: We have the transcripts here offering him a city hall job. Q: In those conversations that you've had with Moto-Brock, and suffice it to say I've got them all here, I've read every one of them, repeatedly. You're not only offering him an internship, you're also offering him an autographed Seahawks football and some other sports memorabilia. Q: For an 18- yo kid, an autographed Seahawks football is a pretty big prize. Now, an internship, sports paraphernalia, an introduction to Bill Gates, help getting into college, you can make a phone call and get him into pre-med at WSU or UW you talk about, you talk about trips to Washington DC. All those are trappings and enticements that come with your job as mayor of the city of Spokane.
Q: All that stuff what? Q: Jim, why don't you come clean with this and tell us what's happened here? You've offered this young man the trappings of your office
. Q: What do you call it then? Sports memorabilia, trips to Washington, come to me in the press box, Warren Moon autograph, they're all just collecting dust you're telling me? An 18yo kid is impressed with sports memorabilia is going to be enticed with a relationship with an older man by those kinds of offers it would seem to me. And they all come to you as virtue to the fact that you are the most powerful man in this city. What do you have to say to that? Q: I'm just going to tell you how this is going to wash with the general public. There going to say here's a 54, 55yo mayor and he's engaged in lengthy chats and what psychologists might call grooming on line with who he thought was a 17yo, 18yo Ferris High School student. He's offered him these perks, whether they mean anything to you is beside the point, you've offered him a job in the most important office in the city, and people Q: Have you met kids on gay.com? Q: My question is, obviously in these transcripts, you talked about your fondness for young men. And you talked about your gayness. Which I again, concede as a personal issue. But again, you're talking to him in the capacity. You sent this young man your photo. Q: You did, and initially he lied and said he was 18 to get on the website. Q: And that's when you offered him the sports memorabilia. That's all correct. But the point is he is of legal age of consent. There's no question about that. Q: No, because he never met you. You went to Indian Canyon that Sunday morning in your blue Lexus, about two buckets of golf balls, and you were looking for Moto-Brock, but he never showed up. But our photographer did and so did some other witnesses to verify
.. Q: But the fact is you told Moto-Brock to meet me tomorrow at 10 o'clock. That's in the transcript. You were hoping to meet this young man. Q: But you were also interested in him for other reasons, weren't you? Q: In this book are two sessions of online sex. You're not going to talk about it? Why don't you just come clean and tell me that it happened and that is part of who you are? Q: You don't want to talk about it Q: In fact, if you were a little more open about this, I think people would show a lot more compassion and understanding about where you're coming from. No one is picking on you because of your likes or preferences. That's not the issue here. The issue is you using your office as mayor reaching out to people and trying to entice or lure them. Either if it's a dinner date with your blue Lexus or if it's jobs at City Hall with pay or not, or whether it's trips to Washington DC with you. You talk to him repeatedly about going to Washington. For a young kid, it's a big enticement. Q: What was it for then? What did you hope to become of it? Q: Who is doing the reaching out? Q: I've read them. First conversation, less than 100 words into it, the word sex appears. It was raised by you, not him. The issue of "do you get hard when you look at boys in the shower" was raised by you, not him. The issue of basically masturbating online before you went to be the MC at the Met Theatre. Again, it was initiated it seemed to me by you. Are you disputing that? Q: Would you like to see it? Q: I'm just trying to understand the issue here again. If you were Jim West, truck driver, and you were on AOL
, we wouldn't be having this conversation. You're the mayor of our city and you were offering lures to a teenage boy. How is that going to rest with your conservative, republican constituents? Q: How does that square with the JimWest that we see in the legislature, who is trying to outlaw teenage sex? Q: He's 18, he's a teenager Q: The point is, how does this activity of your's that we've documented very thoroughly over the painstakingly, I might add, over the last eight months, how does that square with your persona as a legislature who is almost homophobic who opposed
Q: Karen, ask him some questions in that regard Q: All the gay rights legislation that has been advanced, you've opposed. Q: I didn't use the word. You've opposed and you've introduced a bill, I can't remember the date right now, but with Steve Furman and a couple of the other conservative legislators in this area, that would ban gays from any state job and would have required interviews of gay people to confess their sexual orientation before they were hired for a state job. It never went anywhere, but why would you do that. Isn't that hypocrisy? Q: You didn't sign it, it didn't pass. You proposed it when you sponsored it. Q: If you're gay or bisexual, why would you do that? Q: It was in the 1980s Q: Alright that's one of them, then there's been the whole series of gay rights bills that Cal Anderson and Rep. Ed Murray tried to expand our anti-discrimination to cover gay people. If you are gay or bisexual why would you pose that? Q: By supporting that bill, you are discriminating, aren't you? Q: You don't think that's hypocritical to be privately gay and yet take positions in public that might hurt? Q: Gay community says your [ INAUDIBLE ] Q: I know that in some of the transcripts I read you talked on one occasion about not liking out, people who are out, because they were liberal, because they had a liberal agenda. Is that part of what's going on? Q: [ INAUDIBLE ] passed, lots of people supported it. Was that for the same reason? You don't think gays should be allowed to marry? Q: Do you support civil unions for gays? Q: What we're trying to understand here, we're students of this and we're sympathetic with you Jim, we're not picking on you. I know you probably think otherwise. What you do in your private life is so starkly different from what Karen has seen and what I've seen in your political life and we're just trying to wrestle with why is that? Why is there such a big difference between Jim West the politician and Jim West the private citizen who goes on gay.com?
Q: That's your business, I agree with you. Help us understand that gap. That schism between Jim West the career politician and Jim West at night at home talking to Moto-Brock or [ NAME REDACTED ] or to [ NAME REDACTED ] or to any of your hot picks or to any of the others that we know about. Explain that gap. Q: I've talked to various people for this story and several of them said, well people in Spokane believe this is a family values town. You don't think your [ INAUDIBLE ] undermines that at all? Q: Don't you think you're [ INAUDIBLE ] mayor and enticing young men who are barely of legal age, enticing whatever you want to call it, offering them internships, might undercut that image here in Spokane? Q: That's true, but you also saw in there a potential sex partner, in fact, you did have sex online with him. So it's somebody that you
.. Q: Which is commonly called online sex. Q: Were again wrestling with, you're saying that the issue that you can't be gay and be a conservative. Is that what you're trying to tell us? Q: Well I'm asking you. Back to the question about Jim West the politician vs. Jim West the private individual. Why the apparent hypocrisy then?: Q: That's fine. We're here to understand you. It's a fascinating issue, but you seem to be saying you can't be conservative and be a republican and be openly gay. Is that what you're saying? Do you have to be a Liberal Democrat to be gay? Q: You use the name rightbi-guy. And in fact, you've dated women, you talk on there about dating women. In fact you talk about your marriage and how during your marriage you couldn't help thinking about men or boys. Young men. Does it go back to your scout days? Q: Were you ever sexually abused yourself? Q: As a boy? As a teenager? Q: You don't know? Q: The one other person I want to ask about real quickly and that is Michael Grant. Do you know who Michael Grant is? Q: He is a young man who's come forward and he says you abused him also and apparently it was in your capacity of one of these trips to [ INAUDIBLE ] He said he was introduced to you like Galliher, through Hahn, and that you sexually abused him. Including one time at Camp Cowles. Michael George Grant Jr. Your response is? Q: [ INAUDIBLE ]
. Whom are felons, who say that you sexually abused them. In a sentence or two, your response is. Q: For those people who say if the allegations of these young men are true, going back to your days as a deputy. Q: [ INAUDIBLE ] are you [ INAUDIBLE ] that there's appearances that you may have misused the public trust that was extended to you a boy scout leader, a sheriff's deputy, a politician and now mayor to develop sexual relationships with young men? Q: Explain that to me. Q: You never misused the public trust you have through being a boy scout, a sheriff's deputy, a politician or mayor to develop sexual relationships with young men? Q: Well, what about Moto-Brock, and what about [ NAME REDACTED ]? Q: But you were in public office when you developed a relationship with them. Q: Did you offer those women jobs in your office? Q: Well it's pretty impressive for a senior at Ferris High School to get an internship in the
. Q: You don't get paid a dime? Q: But it looks good on a resume. Q: In a sentence then
.. Q: So as to the people who say that you used the trappings of your public office to lure or develop relationships with young men, your response would be? Q: Not true why? Q: Ever? Q: As to Moto-Brock and [ NAME REDACTED ], you're not using your trappings of your office there? Q: I'm not asking about Q: No, we're not saying that. Q: It might be. Q: Who was she? [ INAUDIBLE ] Q: [ INAUDIBLE ]
..in his rookie? Q: [ INAUDIBLE ]
..teenager, don't you see how people are going to [ INAUDIBLE ] Q: What is it then? Q: I just want to make it clear because there are people who will say, including our lawyer, it's our belief when you offer these trappings of a public office to a young person that they could be viewed fairly and objectively as enticements or inducements to become your buddy, to become my special buddy. Maybe for golf, become my buddy. Go for a ride in my Lexus. And if you're saying they're not enticements, that's your option. I just want you to be able to say to that. Q: What else do you want to say about the subject matter we've covered here today. Q: Do you have anything else you want to say, that we haven't talked about? Q: I just want to ask you one of the other things people have said, you can call them cynics if you want, from your opponents on the Democratic side, that every time that [ INAUDIBLE ] ran for office, he had a woman on his arm, but he dumped them afterward. Is that true? Q: Who have you heard say that? Q: What have you heard people say regarding your fondness for young men? Q: They've never confronted you about that? Q: This is the first time someone's looked you in the eye ball and asked these questions? Q: Are you surprised that we are? Q: Is there anything else? Q: Just to reiterate because you talk to people, I talk to people like Bill Tallmadge who has the highest respects for your legislative skills and he said yeah, the rumors are out there about Jim being gay while we were in the legislature. Most of the things he worked on, [ INAUDIBLE ] on gay people. I just want, one more time, why, why? You don't have to be a liberal, but is it not possible to be a gay man and be out? Why did you feel, bisexual or whatever you want to call yourself, why was it necessary to keep this quiet, to yourself for so many years?
Q: Between your public life and your private life? Q: Do you feel like you've hurt your stance? Q: Is there something else that we haven't given you an opportunity to say here
Q: I don't want to put words in your mouth. If there's something, we've covered the waterfront as far as we're concerned. Is there something you want to revisit or add to, I just want to give you that opportunity. Q: Do you think it's unfair for us to be asking these questions? Q: You're entitled to your opinion. That's what is has to do with the story.
Q: Just beyond the people, the specific people making allegations about you, the Gallihers and Mr. Grant, just to broaden that out, when you are a boy scout leader and you had associations with probably thousands of young boys, did you ever do anything inappropriate with those boys? Q: Not specifically. But they did say you would have audiences with them at your house, have pizza, and then select some of them to go out on one-on-one dates at a later occasion. Q: Well, you would go out to dinner.. Q: Yes, you would invite them to your house for pizza or beer, and you would make alcohol available to underage kids. I had several of them tell me that. Q: And that then some of them you would ask out for one on one's to go to a movie and a dinner at some later date. I'm not implying by telling you that I think there's anything wrong with that, I'm just telling you what I've been told. Did that happen? Q: So people who said yeah I went out on, we met through the cub scouts, or got involved in his campaign, and then later have us over to his house for pizza and sodas or whatever, and then later he would ask one or two of us to go out exclusively to go to a show with him. Q: Jim your profile that Carla Johnson, one of my reporters did when you were running for mayor, I was struck by one quote where you said that "life was short, and you were going to do what you wanted to do" in [ INAUDIBLE ], that was context. Is that part of the reason you're on gay.com now, you said it was recent. Q: You don't know why you've gone there? Q: We appreciate you coming in. This isn't personal. We're doing our jobs. Q: Not personal on end, we're just doing our job. Thanks for your time. |
|
HOT DEALS |
About
|