<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>SR.com Blogs | River Park Square coverage review</title>
    <link>http://www.spokesmanreview.com/blogs/rps/</link>
    <description>Following the Washington News Council's independent review of The Spokesman-Review's coverage of River Park Square.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2009 The Spokesman-Review. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>11/7/2009 5:47:27 PM</lastBuildDate>
    <ttl>20</ttl>

	<item>
      <title>Newsroom RPS conversations</title>
	  <link>http://www.spokesmanreview.com/blogs/rps/archive.asp?postID=15043</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;These are video clips from two newsroom conversations about the RPS report. The first was at the morning meeting:&lt;br&gt;&lt;p id=&quot;player0001&quot; class=&quot;flvplayer&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer&quot;&gt;Get the Flash Player&lt;/a&gt; to see this player.&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;var FO = {movie:&quot;/media/flash/flvplayer/flvplayer.swf&quot;,width:&quot;160&quot;,height:&quot;140&quot;,majorversion:&quot;7&quot;,build:&quot;0&quot;,bgcolor:&quot;#FFFFFF&quot;,flashvars:&quot;file=/media/flv/051407_rps.flv&amp;showdigits=true&amp;image=/media/flv/051407_rps.jpg&quot; };UFO.create( FO, &quot;player0001&quot;);&lt;/script&gt; ( &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.spokesmanreview.com/blogs/rps/archive.asp?postID=15043&apos; title=&apos;full post&apos;&gt;Full post&lt;/a&gt; )&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <datePosted>5/14/2007 3:20:20 PM</datePosted>
    </item>

	<item>
      <title>Responses to report, recommendations</title>
	  <link>http://www.spokesmanreview.com/blogs/rps/archive.asp?postID=15017</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Editor Steven A. Smith responds to the recommendations in the River Park Square audit and former Spokesman-Review editor Chris Peck weighs in:&lt;br&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Text:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;/breaking/story.asp?ID=9870&quot;&gt;Editor responds to report&apos;s recommendations&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Text:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;/breaking/story.asp?ID=9869&quot;&gt;Former editor Chris Peck challenges report&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt; ( &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.spokesmanreview.com/blogs/rps/archive.asp?postID=15017&apos; title=&apos;full post&apos;&gt;Full post&lt;/a&gt; )&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <datePosted>5/12/2007 6:00:00 PM</datePosted>
    </item>

	<item>
      <title>Publication of the final report</title>
	  <link>http://www.spokesmanreview.com/blogs/rps/archive.asp?postID=14834</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Washington News Council has published its final report in the independent analysis of The Spokesman-Review&apos;s coverage of the River Park Square development project. You can download the full document here, as well as read excerpts and a response from Editor Steve Smith. ( &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.spokesmanreview.com/blogs/rps/archive.asp?postID=14834&apos; title=&apos;full post&apos;&gt;Full post&lt;/a&gt; )&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <datePosted>5/5/2007 6:00:00 PM</datePosted>
    </item>

	<item>
      <title>RPS audit publishes Sunday</title>
	  <link>http://www.spokesmanreview.com/blogs/rps/archive.asp?postID=14850</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;As many of you know, The Spokesman-Review commissioned an independent audit of the newspaper&apos;s River Park Square coverage. ( &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.spokesmanreview.com/blogs/rps/archive.asp?postID=14850&apos; title=&apos;full post&apos;&gt;Full post&lt;/a&gt; )&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <datePosted>5/4/2007 12:07:55 PM</datePosted>
    </item>

	<item>
      <title>Inlander piece</title>
	  <link>http://www.spokesmanreview.com/blogs/rps/archive.asp?postID=10445</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;As expected, The Inlander has a piece today about the RPS review. ( &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.spokesmanreview.com/blogs/rps/archive.asp?postID=10445&apos; title=&apos;full post&apos;&gt;Full post&lt;/a&gt; )&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <datePosted>9/21/2006 1:58:01 PM</datePosted>
    </item>

	<item>
      <title>Coverage will be interesting</title>
	  <link>http://www.spokesmanreview.com/blogs/rps/archive.asp?postID=10348</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;My op-ed, &lt;a href=&quot;/opinion/story.asp?ID=150300&quot;&gt;a slightly different version &lt;/a&gt;of the posting that launched this site, runs in the Tuesday paper. I&apos;m expecting it will provoke some reaction from those interested, perhaps even our critics. ( &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.spokesmanreview.com/blogs/rps/archive.asp?postID=10348&apos; title=&apos;full post&apos;&gt;Full post&lt;/a&gt; )&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <datePosted>9/18/2006 4:35:15 PM</datePosted>
    </item>

	<item>
      <title>Independent review of our River Park Square coverage</title>
	  <link>http://www.spokesmanreview.com/blogs/rps/archive.asp?postID=10320</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;With this posting, I’m adding to the Transparent Newsroom a section dealing with the independent review of The Spokesman-Review&apos;s River Park Square coverage from 1994 to 2005. ( &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.spokesmanreview.com/blogs/rps/archive.asp?postID=10320&apos; title=&apos;full post&apos;&gt;Full post&lt;/a&gt; )&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <datePosted>9/17/2006 7:26:45 PM</datePosted>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>